http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm
Recommended Reading: Saul Alinsky, The American Organizer
Reveille for Radicals
by Saul Alinsky
Vintage; Reissue edition (October 23, 1989)
Buy It
Rules for Radicals
by Saul Alinsky
Vintage; Reissue edition (October 23, 1989)
Buy It
An inspiration to anyone contemplating action in their community! And to every organizer!
Saul Alinsky wrote the book on American radicalism - two books, in fact: a 1945 best-seller, "Reveille for Radicals" and "Rules for Radicals" in 1971. The "Reveille" title page quotes Thomas Paine... "Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul."
Saul Alinsky, who was a labor and civil-rights activist from the 1910's until he died in 1972, has written here a guidebook for those who are out to change things. He sets down what the goal is: a society where people are free to live, and also aren't starving in the streets. A society where there is legal and economic justice. Then he sets out to say how to get there.
Alinsky spends a lot of time critiquing the idea that "The end does not justify the means." What end? What means? He feels that there are circumstances where one can and should use means that in other circumstances would be unethical. I am not sure I agree, but Alinsky certainly speaks with the voice of experience.
Alinsky's goal seems to be to encourage positive social change by equipping activists with a realistic view of the world, a kind of preemptive disillusionment. If a person already knows what evil the world is capable of, then perhaps the surprise factor can be eliminated, making the person a more effective activist. Alinsky further seems to be encouraging the budding activist not to worry to much about getting his or her hands dirty. It's all a part of the job, he seems to say.
Alinsky, the master political agitator, tactical planner and social organizer didn't mince words...
"Liberals in their meetings utter bold works; they strut, grimace belligerently, and then issue a weasel-worded statement 'which has tremendous implications, if read between the lines.' They sit calmly, dispassionately, studying the issue; judging both sides; they sit and still sit.
"The Radical does not sit frozen by cold objectivity. He sees injustice and strikes at it with hot passion. He is a man of decision and action. There is a saying that the Liberal is one who walks out of the room when the argument turns into a fight.
"Society has good reason to fear the Radical. Every shaking advance of mankind toward equality and justice has come from the Radical. He hits, he hurts, he is dangerous. Conservative interests know that while Liberals are most adept at breaking their own necks with their tongues, Radicals are most adept at breaking the necks of Conservatives.
"Radicals precipitate the social crisis by action - by using power. Liberals may then timidly follow along or else, as in most cases, be swept forward along the course set by Radicals, but all because of forces unloosed by Radical action. They are forced to positive action only in spite of their desires ...
"The American Radical will fight privilege and power whether it be inherited or acquired by any small group, whether it be political or financial or organized creed.
"He curses a caste system which he recognizes despite all patriotic denials.
"He will fight conservatives whether they are business or labor leaders.
"He will fight any concentration of power hostile to a broad, popular democracy, whether he finds it in financial circles or in politics.
"The Radical recognizes that constant dissension and conflict is and has been the fire under the boiler of democracy. He firmly believes in that brave saying of a brave people, "Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
"The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people.
"That is the reason why Radicals, although frequently embarking upon revolutions, have rarely resorted to personal terrorism."
Alinsky practiced what he preached. He said, "Tactics means doing what you can with what you have ... tactics is the art of how to take and how to give."
He uses eyes, ears and nose for examples...
Eyes
"If you have a vast organization, parade it before the enemy, openly show your power."
Ears
"If your organization is small, do what Gideon did: conceal the members in the dark but raise a clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more that it does."
Nose
"If your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place."
Alinsky devised and proved thirteen tactical rules for use against opponents vastly superior in power and wealth.
1. "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. "Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. "Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.
6. "A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. "Keep the pressure on.
9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. "Major premise for tactics is development of operations that will maintain constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
"The real action is in the enemy's reaction. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength. Tactics, like life, require that you move with the action."
Alinsky was hated and defamed by powerful enemies, proof that his tactics worked. His simple formula for success...
"Agitate + Aggravate + Educate + Organize"
http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm










9 comments:
And this is a surprise to anyone?
The only difference now is that the NEA (along with so many others) no longer feels the need to hide their agenda.
Generations of covert indoctrination in the school system has yeided the fruit of so many Americans who think that socialism (and worse) are OK, if not preferred.
So this is news?
Like all so-called radical movements, once they obtain the poer they so rabidly pursued, they become the problem.
How ironic that the Conservative movement is about protecting the individual's right to be free from government, while the Liberal/Progressive movement is all about accumulating power to the state under the ruse, it is for the people. Which means government unions and their hand maidens, the Democrat Party and all those it has managed to enslave in government dependence.
For thousands of years Liberals fought for the rights of man. Now, they fight for group rights and ever expanding government control, while Conservatives struggle to maintain and preserve the rights of individual liberty from the tyrannical dictate of the state.
Liberals are now statists, while Conservatives fight to preserve the freedoms our nation was founded upon and limit government.
Unions + The Democrat Party = Socialism + Government Control = Totalitarianism = Loss of Individual Freedom.
Is any one surprised that Teachers' Unions would be following the dictates of a Communist like Saul Alinsky? After all, they are a huge government union. In fact, the majority of unionized workers draw a paycheck from our governments - local, county, state and federal. That is a whole lot of folks who can not be fired, make up the rules and regulate what we do. John Stuart Mills warns of the inherent affinity to preserve and accumulate power by the government through its bureaucracy.
Time to trim our local government. Let's start at Cottage Place and its $84 million budget by ridding ourselves of the way too many administrators employed in that building. Then let's start looking at the number of administrators in the schools. After that, let us turn our attention to the contract with the teachers' union. Time to reign in local government on all fronts. From fiscal ($48 million BOE bond) to policy (the over reaching RHS student conduct code).
This is our government, not theirs. It is there to serve us, not rule us.
8:54am - Agree!! My feeling is that they have awoken the sleeping giant.
Robust argument and engagement is part of the process. I feel that if they could get away with calling us "teabaggers", they would.
I encourage everyone to make your voice heard between now and especially Dec 8th. A 15% turnout guarantees passage of the referendum by apathy. Speak your mind and vote your conscience.
I am voting NO, and I am not alone in my views and concerns.
Re: "Robust argument and engagement is part of the process. I feel that if they could get away with calling us "teabaggers", they would."
Only liberal degenerates even know what teabaggers are. I'll bet that everyone who was being called a teabagger had to look it up to find out what it meant.
This insult is more a reflection of the degenerate state of the name-callers rather than an effective shot at the protesters.
12noon - thank you!! I find it sad that a former president of the United States called some of us citizens "teabaggers".
It spoke volumes about the character of the man.
Not to mention Katie Couric...
She also called the Tea Party protesters, teabaggers during her prime time coverage of the news.
Are they both that stupid and misinformed or are they thinly diguised petty hateful liberal ideologues?
You make the call.
ummmm ask my girl what it means to get teabagged lol
Post a Comment